Court Summons The Peoples Gazette Over False Publication Against Buratai

The former Chief of Army Staff, Ambassador Tukur Buratai through Mr. Bello Isah has slammed a lawsuit against popular online tabloid, The Peoples Gazette over false publication.

The Peoples Gazette had published in June that ICPC recovered multi-million naira cash, Rolex wristwatches, and apartment from the former Chief of Army Staff meanwhile, the ICPC official statement never reflected People Gazette’s position.

In a court document obtained by this publication, People Gazette was given 42 days to appear before the court to answer some questions and provide evidence to back up their claims against the person of Ambassador Tukur Buratai.

The court summons stated that; Let THE PEOPLES GAZETTE LTD within FORTY-TWO (42) days after the service of this summons, inclusive of the day of such service causes an
appearance to be entered for him to this summons which is issued upon the application of ISAH BELLO of No 64, Muhammadu Buhari Way, who claims to be entitled to the reliefs hereafter set out and for the determination of the following questions:

Whether the Refusał and/or Neglect of the Defendant to grant the application of the Plaintiff vide his letter dated June 28, 2022, does not amount to an infringement of the provision of Section 4 of the Freedom of Information Act 2011?

 

Court Summons The Peoples Gazette Over False Publication Against Buratai

 

Plaintiff claims against Defendant as follows:

(1) A Declaration that the refusal, failure, and or neglect by the Defendant to release the information requested by the Plaintiff in his letter dated June 28 2022 amounts to a violation of Section 4(a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2011 and therefore is wrongful and illegal.

(2) An ORDER DIRECTING the Defendant including her servants, agents, privies, officials, and or cohorts to furnish the Plaintiff with detailed information as stated in Plaintiff’s letter dated June 28 2022 until Judgment is delivered in this case within 14 days of the delivery of Judgment.

(3) The cost of this Action.

(4)Any further order (s) as the Court may deem fit and proper to make in the circumstances of this case.

Also, part of the court summon which was tagged CASH, ROLEX WATCHES STOCKPILED IN EX-ARMY CHIEF BURATAI’S ABUJA”, now produced and marked EXHIBITA stated that the June 28 2022 letter of the Plaintiff requested the following response from the Defendant viz:

“1. Did you verify the allegations contained in your write-up with ICPC before publishing? This is because the ICPC press release of June 24, 2022 states to the contrary that Buratai owns the house in Wuse lI Abuja or has links with the K Salam Construction Company Nigeria Limited.

2. Did you check with corporate affairs commission as to who the Owners of the K Salam Construction Company Nigeria Limited are? And perhaps whether Buratai’s name appears as part of the company directorship?

You claimed you called Buratai during the ICPC raid on the Wuse 2 House. At what time and day did you call Ambassador Buratai? What number did you use in calling him? And which of the Buratai lines did you call?

(d) But surprisingly and since the receipt of the request/application letter, and up till the filing of this suit, Defendant has so far failed, refused
and /or neglected to provide the Plaintiff with the details of the information
requested for.

That I know as a fact by being a PUBLISHER /JOURNALIST that:
(a) By virtue of Section 1 (1) of the FOI Act 2011, PLAINTIFF is entitled as of right to request for or gain access to information which is in the custody or possession of any public official, agency, or institution.

(b) The information requested for by the Plaintiff relates to CORRUPTION allegations against the former Army Chief and facts supposedly held by the Defendant but has shied from giving truth to the allegations.

See the attached document below:

By Iyabo Aina

Publisher News Rain Nigeria